34 new stem cell journals since 2004: is this a good thing?

Aug 18th, 2010
Jump to related media:

   stories icon  youtube icon  


Five years ago, it would take a lot of effort just to find a single scientific journal devoted to stem cells. Now, the authors of a survey of the field found 34 of them without even trying that hard; meanwhile, major results can find a home in less-specialized journals like Development Nature , and Science . The authors consider two possible outcomes of this proliferation of journals, both of them potentially disturbing for the scientific community: either the new journals pay host to a lot of low-quality papers, or abuse of peer review is driving otherwise good work into obscure outlets

a6f0d236b75872 f.jpg 34 new stem cell journals since 2004: is this a good thing?

Read the original here:
ArsTechnica

youtube iconRelated Youtube videos

Loading...

twitter iconRelated Tweets

No comments yet.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

Other Language

Resources


Categories

Archives

Important source